[address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elvis Velea
elvis at velea.eu
Tue Oct 1 10:55:43 CEST 2013
Hi Tore, On 10/1/13 9:08 AM, Tore Anderson wrote: > * Elvis Velea > >> No, I do not agree to call them LIR, the LIR is well defined. You are >> right, we maybe should not call them End Users either, let's work on >> redefining the End User to something else. > > The terms LIR (and IR) is indeed well defined, and that's indeed my > point - these new "super End Users" actually fit that definition. :-) Okay, got the point and somehow agree with it. > > (I'm only talking about the role of the LIR in the Internet Registry > System here, so to be clear I'm *not* equating "LIR" to "direct member > of the RIPE NCC who pays the full membership fee and has voting rights > at the AGM", nor am I saying that everyone who holds PI space should be > forced become such direct members of the RIPE NCC.) > Well, since the assignments will be removed, anyone receiving a sub-allocation from the friendly provider can further sub-allocate (as long as they receive more than a /64) and become some sort of IR. But, would you consider yourself an IR if you receive a sub-allocation from your ISP and sub-allocate a /64 to your brother for his web server? > Anyway, I think I've made my point, so I'll leave it at that and let > this be my last message on the subject. Like I've said before, this is > not intended to be a "my way or the highway" statement of opposition, > just a (hopefully) constructive piece of feedback you and your > co-authors may do with as you wish. One of the slides at the RIPE Meeting (and I hope you will be in Athens) will be related to this subject and I hope we can have a constructive discussion and reach a good decision. thanks for all the feedback, please continue to bring it on ;) cheers, elvis
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]