[address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Sat Mar 30 15:33:55 CET 2013
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Tore Anderson <tore at fud.no> wrote: > Also, I don't want to have the proposal "accidentally" change the > effective policy wrt. what kind of contractual arrangements are > mandatory at what time, and since there's many types of legacy > delegation types in existence there's a non-zero chance that removing > the explicit reference to PA space in the above sentence will cause > "jurisdiction creep", which in turn may be controversial in its own > right, and require me to spin another version, and so on. I'd rather > avoid taking that chance at this point. In a nutshell: 2013-03 amputates > the dead policy limbs. Cosmetic surgery can follow later. :-) Very good point. Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]