This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Sat Mar 30 15:33:55 CET 2013
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Tore Anderson <tore at fud.no> wrote: > Also, I don't want to have the proposal "accidentally" change the > effective policy wrt. what kind of contractual arrangements are > mandatory at what time, and since there's many types of legacy > delegation types in existence there's a non-zero chance that removing > the explicit reference to PA space in the above sentence will cause > "jurisdiction creep", which in turn may be controversial in its own > right, and require me to spin another version, and so on. I'd rather > avoid taking that chance at this point. In a nutshell: 2013-03 amputates > the dead policy limbs. Cosmetic surgery can follow later. :-) Very good point. Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]