[address-policy-wg] ARIN position on other RIR resources (was: Re: 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup))
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ARIN position on other RIR resources (was: Re: 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup))
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ARIN position on other RIR resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
John Curran
jcurran at arin.net
Wed Mar 27 13:11:55 CET 2013
> On Mar 27, 2013, at 7:58 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick at inex.ie> wrote: >> ... I'd recommend against developing policy based on a belief that >> ARIN policies don't apply to all resources in the ARIN region, as >> the outcome will not match expectations. > > John, I think this is very much germane to apwg even though it doesn't > relate to 2013-03. Are you talking here about RIR resources which are > formally transferred to ARIN, or resources from other RIRs which are > transferred or deployed somewhere in the ARIN service region, but still > administered by those other RIRs? By "in the ARIN region", I meant resources _in the ARIN registry_ This is common practice, i.e., I believe that each RIR administers resources in their registry per the policies which are developed by their community's processes. FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ARIN position on other RIR resources (was: Re: 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup))
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ARIN position on other RIR resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]