[address-policy-wg] 2012-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Intra-RIR Transfer Policy Proposal)

Since IMO we still have to have needs assessment for transfers (to allow
for inter-RIR transfers), I think it makes sense to allow organizations
seeking a transfer to justify their need over a timeframe that is
reasonable for business planning, so I support a change to 24 months for
transfers.

But either way, what's probably more important is that we adopt an
inter-RIR transfer policy.

-Scott


On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Sebastian Wiesinger <
ripe.address-policy-wg at ml.karotte.org> wrote:

> * Gert Doering <gert at space.net> [2013-03-04 16:03]:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 02:54:53PM +0000, Anfinsen, Ragnar wrote:
> > > Why do we need this policy change, now that 2012-06 is approved and
> being implemented?
> >
> > It's a different timeline - 2012-06 brought back 12 months, this is for
> > 24 months.
>
> I say keep it simple (and kill 2012-03). With 2012-06 in place we have
> a 12 months period everywhere.
>
> Regards
>
> Sebastian
>
> --
> GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A  9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE)
> 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE
> SCYTHE.
>             -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130321/22f3e883/attachment.html>