[address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Mar 11 15:44:29 CET 2013
Hi, On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 03:31:21PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Emilio Madaio <emadaio at ripe.net> wrote: > > > We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments > > to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 18 March 2013. > > Needs a _lot_ more discussion. > > > 1) The impact analysis implies that this applies to RIPE LIRs getting > PA/legacy IP space from non-RIPE RIRs. As I understand the text, this > is not the case. The proposal merely deals with transfer of RIPE > PA/legacy IP space to non-RIPE LIRs. Please read the policy proposal more thoroughly. The wording change to the existing policy only covers "to non-RIPE LIRs" (indeed), but there's a whole new document, the "Inter-RIR transfer policy" - which covers to and from RIPE, starting after the block "[Following text will result in a new RIPE Policy Document ?Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 address space?, if the proposal reaches consensus.]" (The wording change to the existing RIPE IPv4 policy document is needed to avoid a conflict between the new document and the existing policy) Section 2.0 of that new document starts with: "2.0 Transferring IPv4 address space to the RIPE NCC service region" which I find very much to cover "to the RIPE NCC service region"...? [..] > 2) What are the requirements so that another RIR's policy is seen as > "compatible inter-RIR transfer policy"? Who defines this and where? "We permit transfers to RIPE NCC, and transfers from the RIPE NCC, when certain (locally defined) conditions are met" = compatible "We do not permit transfers outside our region" = "incompatible" Explained in more details in the new policy document... > 3) "Increases the supply of IPv4 addresses available to RIPE NCC LIRs" > > Again, I can not see this in the wording of the PDP. If anything, this > decreases the available pool. I am not saying this is good or bad, > merely stating a fact. Please read the document more thoroughly. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]