[address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
boggits
boggits at gmail.com
Mon Mar 11 15:00:46 CET 2013
On 4 March 2013 13:46, Emilio Madaio <emadaio at ripe.net> wrote: > The draft document for the version 2.0 of the proposal 2012-02, > "Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space", has been > published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal > has also been published. Just re-read this and thought that: "Such address space must not contain any block that is assigned to an End User" might cause a problem for those want to transfer space with the end user intact or even in some cases maybe just the end user. I know its out of scope, but was there logic behind this? J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]