[address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Reassigning Referenced ASNs

+1

I'm a little baffled as to why anyone would choose to hasten this at the cost of giving adequate notice? If we followed Randy's proposal to the letter we are still talking about being able to reuse AS# in roughly three months after policy is agreed. That seems fast enough to me, if not a little too fast :)

John

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 26, 2013, at 3:07 AM, "Richard Hartmann" <richih.mailinglist at gmail.com<mailto:richih.mailinglist at gmail.com>> wrote:


On Jun 26, 2013 11:25 AM, "Wilfried Woeber" <Woeber at cc.univie.ac.at<mailto:Woeber at cc.univie.ac.at>> wrote:
>
> In general I support the recycling of AS #s,
> but for operational and consistency reasons I'd be a bit more careful...

There is no shortage of ASn so we have the luxury of being able to be _very_ careful.

Even after an ASn had been reclaimed we can easily wait a significant period of time before recycling them.

Richard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130626/e74718c9/attachment.html>