[address-policy-wg] [db-wg] Guidance Requested: Reassigning Referenced ASNs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [db-wg] Guidance Requested: Reassigning Referenced ASNs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [db-wg] Guidance Requested: Reassigning Referenced ASNs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Erik Bais
erik at bais.name
Wed Jun 26 22:16:41 CEST 2013
Hi Andrey,
You stated (if I may quote you freely) ... that if an AS number is returned, it might / should not impact routing ...
And you are probably right for 99.8% ..
However ... there might be situations where someone would be using a certain BGP community in RPLS for internal reference still while the actual AS number isn't used anymore.
Think about a similar way as how certain routeserver filtering is implemented.
import: from AS6777 action pref=85; accept ANY AND NOT <^[ASAAAA ASXXXX ASYYYYY ASZZZZZ ASWWWW]> AND NOT {0.0.0.0/0}
export: to AS6777 action community .= {6777:6777, 6777:AAAAA, 6777:XXXX, 6777:YYYYY, 6777:ZZZZ, 6777:WWWW}; announce AS-<as-number>
Erik Bais
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [db-wg] Guidance Requested: Reassigning Referenced ASNs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [db-wg] Guidance Requested: Reassigning Referenced ASNs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]