This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] [db-wg] Guidance Requested: Reassigning Referenced ASNs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Reassigning Referenced ASNs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [db-wg] Guidance Requested: Reassigning Referenced ASNs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Tue Jun 25 17:47:46 CEST 2013
On 25/06/2013 14:02, Andrea Cima wrote: > A. Not reassign referenced AS numbers > B. Reassign AS numbers even if referenced > C. Clean up the RIPE Database from references and then reassign the AS numbers > C.1. "Silent" update; or > C.2. Informing the object holder of the update My preference would be for C.1, and that the process of reassignment should not be delayed by replies or a lack of replies from object holders who are referencing the ASNs. As this is an operational issue, is there a need for a policy proposal? Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Reassigning Referenced ASNs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [db-wg] Guidance Requested: Reassigning Referenced ASNs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]