[address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Changing the Status of PI Address Space
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Changing the Status of PI Address Space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Changing the Status of PI Address Space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Thu Jun 20 16:09:08 CEST 2013
On 20/06/2013 14:29, Opteamax GmbH wrote: > On 20.06.2013 13:28, Carsten Schiefner wrote: >> Andrea, all - >> >> full ACK to both: >> >> * Allow status change from LIRs' PI assignments to PA allocations >> >> and to Tore's point: >> >> * Omission of the minimum allocation size constraint >> > Full +1 from my side. > > from ripe perspective the only difference I can see is the fact that PI > is charged seperately. I clearly remember the (funny mentioned) words at > last GM: "we are already trying hard to make a deficit, but obviously we > failed again" ... so allowing new LIR to migrate there PI into PA could > be at least a way to reduce the income ;) > I'm glad someone was listening :-) FWIW, and wearing my own personal hat (the grey-green waterproof one that I had to buy in Amsterdam one year to stop from drowning in the rain), I think this is a good idea. We're going to discuss it at the board meeting next week. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Changing the Status of PI Address Space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Changing the Status of PI Address Space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]