[address-policy-wg] Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members

On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 03:32:31PM +0200, Wilfried Woeber wrote:

> Whether we need a formal "policy" or just an agreement (amongst the members
> of the NCC) to a Service Description and a review of the CPS as maintained
> by the NCC is a sideline issue, imho.
> 
> For now using the framework of the PDP maybe useful and appropriate.

I respectfully suggest it is not.  The current modus operandi for RPKI
in the NCC service region is not only not based on a policy created
by the PDP, it exists despite a policy proposal for that very subject
having failed.  Whether or not that creates a schism might be interesting
to discuss, but is not relevant for the case at hand.  What counts here is
that the absence of policy is not an 'omission' or accident.

So far I have seen support for 2013-04 based on symmetry or equality of
PA, PI and other (former) special cases. While this might have merit
operationally, it cannot support a parallel policy just because there's
nothing to draw the parallel to.  This point of order has not been addressed
so far (and there are multiple solutions to this situation).

Therefore I formally object to 2013-04 being elevated into the next PDP phase.

-Peter