[address-policy-wg] Is the final /8 the correct term ? - semi off track to the 2013-03 discussion..

On Thursday, July 25, 2013, Tore Anderson wrote:

> * Erik Bais
>
> > If you think that the pool which we have left is only the final /8 that
> > we are working into currently (185.x.y.z) I think that the assumption is
> > incorrect.
>
> It is incorrect indeed. This is one of the rather confusing things about
> our current policy that 2013-03 aims to improve. Under 2013-03, the
> phase "the last /8" is completely purged from the policy language.


Which I belive is a good thing.


> > There is still space left at IANA


Yes roughly a /8 in bits an pieces according to IANA management at the last
ICANN meeting.

>

> and once the first RIR reaches below
> > their /9 mark of their final /8 … from my understanding it is , that
> > also that space is going to be allocated to the RIR’s .
> >
> > Also there will be reclaimed space from 2007-01 and closing LIR’s
> > (forced or by people their own decision) and also that space all goes
> > back into the same pool.
>
> Both these statements are correct.


Is it really?
If we remove the needs based criteria will it then be returned to the NCC
or put up for sale?

Hans Petter


-- 
Hans Petter Holen
Mobile +47 45 06 60 54 | hph at oslo.net | http://hph.oslo.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130726/cde01694/attachment.html>