[address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Tue Jan 1 19:56:55 CET 2013
On 12/31/12 9:17 PM, Sascha Lenz wrote: > well, I guess that's how it should have been from the beginning. > I do support this small change. I don't think it makes a real difference anyways. Hi, Well, it does make a difference to those who merged different LIRs in one and have multiple IPv6 allocations :) Thnx for all the support from the AP WG, I think that's the right thing to do ;) Cheers and all good in 2013, Jan Zorz
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]