[address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 28, Issue 1

Hi,

Op 9 dec. 2013, om 23:59 heeft Tore Anderson <tore at fud.no> het volgende geschreven:

> On closer look, it's not the mailing list archive that changed, it's
> the way it's being linked to from the proposal's page:
> 
> ?version=1: <a class="external-link" href="http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2012-October/007258.html" target="_self" title="">https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2012-October/007258.html</a>
> ?version=2: <a class="external-link" href="../../../mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2012-October/007258.html" target="_self" title="">https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2012-October/007258.html</a>
> ?version=3: <a href="../../../../mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2012-October/007258.html">https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2012-October/007258.html</a>
> 
> Somehow a few extraneous ".."s sneaked in the href of v2 and v3....

Even more funny: why show the absolute URL in the text but make the actual href relative?

> (?version=4 seems fixed now and uses an absolute URL. Thanks to whoever did that!)

Which seems the right thing to do :-)

Anyway, it seems this is just a broken link and not a URL change, so all is well. Request to PDO: please fix the links in versions 2 and 3 and make them absolute, just to keep the history correct when someone wants to evaluate the process in the future.

Thanks all!
Sander