[address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sylvain Vallerot
sylvain.vallerot at opdop.net
Sun Aug 11 20:29:10 CEST 2013
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 03:45:22PM +0000, Milton L Mueller wrote: > But if they have to pay a price that reflects the relative scarcity of the > resource they have a much stronger incentive to conserve that the alternative > situation you describe. "Commercials" cannot simply provide all the addresses > their customers want when they cannot replenish their stock without paying a > rising price. We are talking about 1,75 € per address and per year. I guess this wouldn't stop any commercial from reselling to a client who asks for it, and certainly can pay for it, if conservation is abandonned. Best regards, Sylvain
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]