[address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sylvain Vallerot
sylvain.vallerot at opdop.net
Sun Aug 11 13:26:12 CEST 2013
On 01/08/2013 18:24, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 01/08/2013 07:38, Tore Anderson wrote: >> «Fair use: Public IPv4 address space must be fairly distributed to the >> End Users operating networks.» > > Sounds good to me! One minor nit: can you define "fair"? Fair means with equity, and our measure for equity is need (e.g. the contrary of waste). Which implies a need should be evaluated. Once this evaluation is done should it be dropped to the next trash ? Writing it down in a file is easy, simple, and almost an evidence. This file being organised with sections and filled with a bit of explanations and contexts looks like an evidence also. This is ripe-583. So what is the problem with this file ? To me, this form is not a burocratic overhead, it is a tool is use as a guideline when making a new assignment.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]