[address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore at fud.no
Tue Aug 6 17:43:46 CEST 2013
* Hans Petter Holen > since this is going to be replaced we should probably make sure we are > in line with [goal #1 in section #2 of RFC 2050-bis]. As I explained in my reply to David Conrad, I believe the amendment I'll be proposing in version 3.0 of the proposal will ensure that we are. (In a nutshell: Keep "Need" around in its current form for the final /22 allocations issued by the NCC to its members.) > another question is if rfc2050 is "binding" and "limiting" for the RIRs > and if draft-housley is going to be it may have go go trough some RIR > processes too? I think David Conrad answered this already by clearly stating that draft-housley is not intended to be "the New Testament". Tore
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]