[address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Tue Aug 6 07:40:08 CEST 2013
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Tom Vest <tvest at eyeconomics.com> wrote: > If that interpretation is not too far off-base, then I guess you must know > something about the state of IPv6 usage* that I don't know -- or maybe, > your definition of "waste" excludes anything that has been paid for, even > if the purchased/idle stockpiles serve no other purpose than to exacerbate > demand/scarcity among others... ? > > Well, in a historic and current perspective, what do e.g. Apple, Daimler AG, DuPont, Eli Lilly, Ford, Halliburton, HP (twice!), IBM, Prudential Securities, UK Ministry of Defence, UK Work & Pensions need millions of public IP addresses for, each? Perhaps there are one or few others, who in historic times got huge blocks, but which don't need them. -- Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130806/775547f9/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]