This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hans Petter Holen
hph at oslo.net
Thu Aug 1 19:43:59 CEST 2013
On Saturday, July 27, 2013, Randy Bush wrote: > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-resnick-on-consensus-02.txt > > may be of help definitely for me the following are open issues for me -1 how it will affect inter region transfers - if this is important to the community -2 how will it affect reclamation of address space by RIRs - and is this important -3 how wil it affet the critics of the RIRs 1 - presently it will not be simple to establish an inter-RIR transfer policy with Arin. Personally - based on previous discussion at Ripe meeting and other places - I do not think the Arin communicty will change opinion on this, at least until they run out. This could be an issue as the "hidden reserves" of "legacy" assignments are in the Arin region. 2 - I think reclamation by the RIPE NCC will decay over time. 3 - the traders will be happy - he ITUs and critical governments will probably make more noice. how much of an issue is this to us? I liked the proposal initialy - but I do not buy the initial argument that since we have run out, conservation is not important. Since we have run out of unused addresses conservation is in many ways more important - unless we belive v6 can take over. Maybe this proposal will increase the number of transfers for money - thus putting more focus on conservation (all businesses tend to focus on conserving cash) It is not clear to me that theese aspects are well undrestood by the majority, but ai might be wrong. -hph -- Hans Petter Holen Mobile +47 45 06 60 54 | hph at oslo.net | http://hph.oslo.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130801/1c231567/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]