[address-policy-wg] Temporary Internet Assignments policy

On 2012-09-17 18:59, Martin Millnert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 19:19 +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>> There's a thread on nanog-l at the moment about temporary internet assignments:
>>
>>> http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2012-September/051655.html
>> I had already booked a slot in the AP-WG under AOB to talk about this
>> because the policy is broken and needs fixing.  Specifically, the
>> timescales specified in the policy allow the assignment to be made one week
>> before use:  the consistent feedback is that this isn't enough time for
>> large conference organisers to get things organised in time.
>>
>> The problems we're trying to address are:
> <snip>
>
> [Devils advocate] Why must there be special treatment for
> conference-space (temporary assignments) at all?
> Why can't conferences run NAT-something+IPv6 like the rest of
> everything?  Since networky-conferences are the most common requesters
> of these temp-blocks in the first place by my understanding, wouldn't
> that be an excellent place to start adapting to the future rather than
> getting special treatment and sticking to the old?
>
> Couldn't this help with dissipating clue to real networks, etc?
>
> Just a thought.

Clear point of view, I like it !

Regards,
Marcin