[address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Mon Sep 17 19:00:53 CEST 2012
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 06:50:58PM +0200, Martin Millnert wrote: >Two fixes comes to mind: > 1) 2012-04, required if we want to keep the idea of PI - otherwise we >should explicitly decide on removing the distinction... I'd be in favour of removing the distinction altogether - ie. disconnecting the "LIR" function from the "ISP" function. AIUI, this is to be discussed at RIPE65 again? rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]