[address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Mon Sep 17 12:25:35 CEST 2012
On 17/09/2012 10:47, Gert Doering wrote: > ... I'm not sure if "every time the available pool for X is empty, just > grab another slice of the rest and declare it to be 'available for X, but > limited!!'" is a reasonable strategy... +1 To be clear, as proposer of this policy, I'm interested in a long term solution for PI so that we have long term policy clarity for PI assignment in the RIPE service region. I'm not interested in a series of stop-gap measures. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]