[address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Sun Sep 16 17:12:24 CEST 2012
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 04:52:11PM +0200, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: >IPv4 PI was never meant for that, but more for enterprises in order >to be able to multihome. That luxury times are over and I think that >the policy should reflect that. that would be the LIR-centric view. However, I understand the intention of the LIR system for the LIRs to be resource-management organisations rather than a club with exclusive access to resources. Therefore an end-user is no less "entitled" to IP resources than a LIR and 2012-04 in current form is arbitrarily discriminationg. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]