[address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Sep 11 10:11:38 CEST 2012
Hi, On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 09:46:55AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote: > That said, I don't know if APWG have any influence on the NCC's charging > scheme at all. Is it possible for this policy to say something along the > lines of «joining the NCC and obtaining a PA allocation from the last /8 > should cost approximately the same per address as obtaining a PI > assignment from the last /8»? Is that in scope of address policy? APWG can voice an opinion, but that has no legal binding - the fees are decided (voted!) by the paying members in the RIPE NCC general meeting (AGM). So while the NCC board may listen to us (and usually does), and propose a corresponding fee structure, if the members vote against it, APWG has no way to force anything. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]