[address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Sep 6 15:08:07 CEST 2012
Hi, On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:54:59PM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote: > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Dan Luedtke <maildanrl at gmail.com> wrote: > > > <provoking>I don't see how anyone can be against this proposal.</provoking> > > I don't see the real world benefit of the proposal, there are insufficient > arguments for it, and I'm therefore with Tore on this one. > > (So now you perhaps see how anyone _can_ be against it.) Uh. Can you please be a bit more explicit, as not everybody might remember Tore's stance on this? I take it that you are opposing the proposal? Any variant of the proposal, or would you support the "publish, but anonymize rejected transfers" option? It's a bit hard for the chairs to figure out which way to go if opinions are not stated clearly... thanks, Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]