[address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Wed Sep 5 11:50:15 CEST 2012
[with my DB-WG hat on for a moment...] Sascha Luck wrote: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 12:28:59PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote: > >> So... Again your feedback please! Is there anyone who thinks that >> anonymising details of rejected transfers is a bad idea? (and if so: >> please explain why) > > > I'd go one further and anonymise all transfer data. Is this an issue at all, to begin with, as the rightful holder of the allocation will at any time be recorded in the Numbers Registry, aka the RIPE DB? I may be missing something, though! > Who has an > operational *need-to-know* this data? > > rgds, > Sascha Luck > Wilfried.