[address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
boggits
boggits at gmail.com
Mon Sep 3 17:52:42 CEST 2012
On 3 September 2012 16:47, Erik Bais <ebais at a2b-internet.com> wrote: > This would also apply for the transfer policies I assume. So if 2009:03 > would be reverted, it would also allow transfers of larger blocks than what > one might consume in 3 months. > Which would be good looking at routing table size imho. but thats already covered by 2012-03 J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]