[address-policy-wg] Seen this?: (Was: IP Broker for -1.-1.-1.-1)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Seen this?: (Was: IP Broker for -1.-1.-1.-1)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Seen this?: (Was: IP Broker for -1.-1.-1.-1)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Oct 18 15:43:12 CEST 2012
Hi, On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 01:59:40PM +0200, Ond??ej Surý wrote: > seems like it has begun... :( > > (I don't probably need to remind here on this list, that this behavior is against the RIPE policy...) Is it? > I personally (no hat) would propose that RIPE performs an discreet > investigation, asking for references (as in "References from our > many existing lessor companies are available upon request.") and > returning those blocks into the pool when abuse is detected. Transferring address blocks to those in need and receiving monetary compensation in exchange is *not* against RIPE policies. To the contrary, it is expected that the transfers are registered with the RIPE NCC so people know who currently "owns"(*) an address block. Gert Doering -- APWG chair (*) "holds the right to use it" -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 7650 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121018/50687c6e/attachment.bin>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Seen this?: (Was: IP Broker for -1.-1.-1.-1)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Seen this?: (Was: IP Broker for -1.-1.-1.-1)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]