[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] FW: Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses

Dear Sander,

> Ah, there is the misunderstanding. Giving back the address space is not a
separate
> transfer. It's part of the original (temporary) transfer. This rule is only
to prevent people
> from selling addresses on. 

I understund this idea. I think it will be great to write that rule ( ... 24
months of receiving... ) work only for permanent transfers. Whyle formaly for
now it is for any transfers.

--
Kind regards,
Alexey Ivanov
LeaderTelecom B.V. 

15.10.2012 12:22 - Sander Steffann написал(а):
  Hi,
 
   Lets check RIPE-530:

 > Re-allocation must be reflected in the RIPE Database. This re-allocation
may be on either a
> permanent or non-permanent basis.

 > LIRs that receive a re-allocation from another LIR cannot re-allocate
complete or partial blocks of
> the same address space to another LIR within 24 months of receiving the
re-allocation.

For temporary transfer we make 2 transfers: 1. from LIR A to LIR B. .... 2.
Form LIR B to LIR A (back). While address space may not transfer it on within
24 months, so we can't transfer back earlier than in 2 years. 

 Ah, there is the misunderstanding. Giving back the address space is not a
separate transfer. It's part of the original (temporary) transfer. This rule
is only to prevent people from selling addresses on. 
   
  - Sander

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121015/048d1b1a/attachment.html>