[address-policy-wg] Cosmetic Surgery Project: Last Call for Comments on Draft Document for Reverse Delegation Policy ripe-302
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cosmetic Surgery Project: Last Call for Comments on Draft Document for Reverse Delegation Policy ripe-302
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cosmetic Surgery Project: Last Call for Comments on Draft Document for Reverse Delegation Policy ripe-302
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie
Fri Oct 12 17:25:43 CEST 2012
On 12 Oct 2012, at 13:21, Emilio Madaio wrote: > We encourage you to read this merged version. Please send any comments > to address-policy-wg at ripe.net by 26 October 2012. I have an objection on grammatical and aesthetic grounds. This seems particularly appropriate in the context of a "Cosmetic Surgery" review. > 2.0 Introduction > > The RIPE NCC provides the necessary support to enable resolution of IPv4 and IPv6 address space into domain names. This service is implemented under the in-addr.arpa and ip6.arpa sub domains described in [1] and [2]. "Sub" is a prefix, not an adjective. Please substitute for "sub domains" any of the following: "sub-domains" -- a hyphen is usually appropriate after a prefix; "subdomains" -- a well-established derived word needs no hyphen; "domains" -- no qualifying prefix is actually necessary, as both "in-addr.arpa" and "ip6.arpa" are domains, and the value of emphasizing their subsidiarity in this context is doubtful. Have a good weekend, everyone! /Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cosmetic Surgery Project: Last Call for Comments on Draft Document for Reverse Delegation Policy ripe-302
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cosmetic Surgery Project: Last Call for Comments on Draft Document for Reverse Delegation Policy ripe-302
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]