[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
LeaderTelecom B.V.
info at leadertelecom.nl
Tue Oct 9 00:33:48 CEST 2012
Dear James, > So wouldn't the best change be to allow up to allocation window > per annum plus an ability to go via the RIPE NCC for further > sub-allocations? What you mean when tell about "allocation window"? Do you mean assignment window? -- Kind regards, Alexey Ivanov 03.10.2012 20:02 - James Blessing написал(а): On 3 October 2012 15:21, LeaderTelecom B.V. <info at leadertelecom.nl> wrote: > You can sub-allocate up to a /20 every twelve months to a single downstream > Internet Service Provider (ISP). The minimum sub-allocation size is a /24. > This is the smallest prefix length that can be reverse delegated and that > allows for a reasonable number of small assignments to be made by a > downstream network operator. Okay So wouldn't the best change be to allow up to allocation window per annum plus an ability to go via the RIPE NCC for further sub-allocations? J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121009/95ca9257/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]