[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marcin Kuczera
marcin at leon.pl
Wed Nov 7 21:40:59 CET 2012
On 2012-11-07 20:38, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > On 11/7/12 3:57 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: >> On 07/11/2012 14:32, LeaderTelecom Ltd. wrote: >>> I think using PA space is good option for now. >> >> It's good if you're happy to build your business with sticky tape, >> chewing >> gum and string. > > Well, the big part of IETF was quite busy with standardizing "sticky > tape, chewing gum and string" for the last decade probably. > > I'm sure vendors will soon come out with new&shiny tools on their > equipment to easily get around this small issue. They are brilliant at > doing that (and of course charging for additional license somehow) :) > Oh yeah, tha't what I also feel. Vendors will find solutions to keep IPv4 forever... Recently I saw a lot of CarrierGrade NAT presentations on conference schedules... Regards, Marcin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]