[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hamed Shafaghi
hamed at skydsl.ir
Wed Nov 7 20:56:24 CET 2012
> Yeap... but... > > We are an ISP fucusing on individuals (most) and business (minority, but > growing). > Because of nature of our business, we decided to have central BRAS and > large L2 (in future MPLS) network. > So, most of our subscribers are connected via "ethernet all the way", > native DHCP (no PPPoWhatever). > > Both - Cisco/Ericsson(RedBack) - for their BRASes have not yet implemented > this access method for IPv6.. > They have it on roadmap, but it will take a while for first releases and > much more before they will be stable enough to > put them in production. > 2 years at least I suppose.. > > Now, imagine that there is a lot of ISPs like us with the same problem, > however, very often lager scale... > > (I suppose that Juniper and others are at the same stage). > > Regards, > Marcin > We have a same problem in one of our ADSL2+ zone :( -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121107/c3c34b06/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]