[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012102901001081] 2012-05 New Draft and Impact Analysis Documents Published (Transparency in Addre [...]
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012102901001081] 2012-05 New Draft and Impact Analysis Documents Published (Transparency in Addre [...]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012102901001081] 2012-05 New Draft and Impact Analysis Documents Published (Transparency in Addre [...]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Tue Nov 6 13:17:21 CET 2012
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:03 PM, LeaderTelecom Ltd. <info at leadertelecom.ru>wrote: > Dear Nick, > > How are you going to know did company changed name or IPs were transfered? > If I understand the service agreement correctly, a name change also requires a new service agreement for the LIR in question. As you yourself can see from alloclist.txt, there is only the name identifying the organisation. As I understand the proposal, there would not be any new information added, so we still will not be able to see whether a LIR merely changed names or there was more going on, except when something is transfered from one existing LIR to another existing LIR. What is being requested is not a matter of getting information that we are not already getting, it is a matter of providing the same information in a more transparent manner. But that is, again, as I understand it. -- Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121106/b962c193/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012102901001081] 2012-05 New Draft and Impact Analysis Documents Published (Transparency in Addre [...]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012102901001081] 2012-05 New Draft and Impact Analysis Documents Published (Transparency in Addre [...]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]