[address-policy-wg] Assignment transfer among LIR

On 22 May 2012 15:18, Pascal Gloor <pascal.gloor at finecom.ch> wrote:
>>Really, isn't CATV a closed access network that you have control off?
>>Could you do 6to4 (or something similar) at the border if you need to
>>access v4 content? Or have I misunderstood what you are doing?
>
> 6to4 is IPv6 tunnel over IPv4, not the other way around, what you mean is
> DNS46/NAT46 which is outdated, maybe 6rd or MAP46 (which is not yet really
> available).

My bad, I was thinking Stateless NAT64 (aka SIIT)

> But that's not the point. My point is about post-v4-exhaustion policy, not
> about transition technologies, nor about lack of v4. It's about keeping
> the customer assigned v4 space (and not even the IPs, just the assignment
> size).

but why are you trying to keep it on IPv4 and not moving to v6

J
-- 

James Blessing
07989 039 476