[address-policy-wg] Assignment transfer among LIR
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignment transfer among LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignment transfer among LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
James Blessing
james.blessing at despres.co.uk
Tue May 22 15:43:34 CEST 2012
On 22 May 2012 14:33, Pascal Gloor <pascal.gloor at finecom.ch> wrote: >>Why not just use IPv6... > > Using IPv6 does not remove the need of v4, you know that. Plus, my > proposal is not about using more v4, but just about keeping the same > number of v4 and being able to change ISP. Transforming the PA into PI and > allowing the transfer could also be a solution but I don't like it due to > possible massive deaggregation. Really, isn't CATV a closed access network that you have control off? Could you do 6to4 (or something similar) at the border if you need to access v4 content? Or have I misunderstood what you are doing? J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignment transfer among LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignment transfer among LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]