[address-policy-wg] 2012-03 New Policy Proposal (Intra-RIR Transfer Policy Proposal)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-03 New Policy Proposal (Intra-RIR Transfer Policy Proposal)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-03 New Policy Proposal (Intra-RIR Transfer Policy Proposal)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Thu May 10 15:39:31 CEST 2012
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Emilio Madaio <emadaio at ripe.net> wrote: > > > Dear Colleagues > > A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-530, "IPv4 Address Allocation > and Assignment Policy for the RIPE NCC Service Region", is now > available for discussion. > > > > You can find the full proposal at: > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-03 > If I understand the rationale correctly, the change essentially means that a LIR has more time to actually implement a use of a transferred block, than they have for a new block. I am a n00b at these matters, but I don't quite see why this is an important change, and why as much as 24 months is necessary. Could someone please try to enlighten me? -- Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20120510/9aa663ea/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-03 New Policy Proposal (Intra-RIR Transfer Policy Proposal)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-03 New Policy Proposal (Intra-RIR Transfer Policy Proposal)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]