[address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Wed May 9 16:04:15 CEST 2012
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Tore Anderson < tore.anderson at redpill-linpro.com> wrote: > It's also worth noting, perhaps, that in the APNIC region both > allocations and assignments appear to be capped at a /22. 2012-04 > proposes capping PI at a /24, which I suppose may further diminish > concerns that allowing PI in the first place will make the last /8 go > away too quickly. On the other hand, limiting PI at /24 but PA at /22 > would still cause the effect of forcing organisations to become LIRs, if > the organisation's requirement cannot be fulfilled with a /24 only. > That's kind of pointless, if the only assignment they'll ever make as > LIRs is to their own organisation. So I think it would be even better if > we did like APNIC did and capped both PI and PA at a /22 - that way, all > the internet organisations in the region gets to have life rafts of the > exact same size. (But perhaps they should be equally priced also...) > I like your reasoning. Regarding the parenthetical comment, I think it would be sane if there was a slightly less-than-proportionate price increase going from /24 to /22, and that this was decoupled from the whole PI/PA choice. Maybe it should cost more to be a LIR, but I think that is a different issue than the address block size. -- Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20120509/c7ab886e/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]