[address-policy-wg] 2011-04 Discussion Period extended until 30 January (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 Discussion Period extended until 30 January (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 Discussion Period extended until 30 January (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Tue Jan 10 09:28:42 CET 2012
On 1/9/12 5:23 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > maybe we need to disagree. I don't support the proposal as-is, but would > support the proposal if it were to include minimal justification for /29 > (based on the current default of /32). Nick, hi. Ok, I hear what you are saying. > > To recap, the reason I hold this view is: > > - it is a minimal change which requires virtually no overhead by the LIR, > but will get them to think about whether they really need the space or not. I think the price difference in LIR membership will probably make them think - more resources, bigger LIR ;) > > - many LIRs will never need to use 6rd or any other transition technology, > so assigning an extra 3 bits of address space is wasteful > > - For the sort of LIR which doesn't require a transition technology like > this, /32 is probably a lot more than the LIR will ever need anyway. > > - RIPE and the RIPE NCC have a duty of good stewardship to the resources > which they maintain. Increasing the amount of space allocated to LIRS by a > factor of 8 without any justification whatever is (imo) bad stewardship of > resources. Let's see what others think - WG, any thoughts? Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 Discussion Period extended until 30 January (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 Discussion Period extended until 30 January (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]