[address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02

Hi Immo,

On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 02:35:09PM +0100, Immo 'FaUl' Wehrenberg wrote:
> Gert wrote:
> > Looking at all the messages that have been posted in the discussions
> > following my e-mails, I categorize your feedback as follows:
> [...]
> >  - statements of "we do not have consensus"
> >      (Immo Wehrenberg, on the assumption that consensus has to be unanimous
> >       Remco Van Mook)
> 
> I'm afraid I have to correct you here. I said that I'm not sure wether we have
> consensous or not and i would follow Gezas opinion on that. Since Geza has not
> objected that consensous is reached, I assume that we have consensous now.
> 
> Just a clarification, sorry that I did not make this clear in the first place.

Thanks for the clarification.  This wasn't fully clear to me - now it is :-)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20120105/bd81d989/attachment.sig>