[address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012123101000341] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs [...]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mathieu Paonessa
matoa at vayu.net
Mon Dec 31 15:08:51 CET 2012
Dear All, I also support this. On 12/31/12 11:12 AM, Emilio Madaio wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > > A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-552, "IPv6 Address Allocation > and Assignment Policy", is now available for discussion. > > > You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-10 > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 28 January 2013. > > Regards > > Emilio Madaio > Policy Development Officer > RIPE NCC > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012123101000341] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs [...]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]