[address-policy-wg] 2012-09 New Policy Proposal (Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-09 New Policy Proposal (Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-09 New Policy Proposal (Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dan Luedtke
maildanrl at gmail.com
Sun Dec 16 13:11:04 CET 2012
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: >> Can't we just say n days instead of month? >> With n being 30* days? > > So, do you want to see this policy implemented quickly, or do you want to > paint a bikeshed instead? I would be more than happy if there is any way to speed up the PDP on this proposal. I just had to admin that I see Richard's point. This wasn't meant to be against the proposal, which, as stated earlier, I still support. Regards Dan -- Dan Luedtke http://www.danrl.de
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-09 New Policy Proposal (Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-09 New Policy Proposal (Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]