[address-policy-wg] IPv4 Maintenance Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 Maintenance Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 Maintenance Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Wed Apr 25 15:28:59 CEST 2012
On 25/04/2012 14:21, Milton L Mueller wrote: > I note that another member of this list stated: "It's clear that there > is a problem here which needs to be fixed, and which balances both the > concerns of the ERX holders and the RIPE community (+ by extension, the > RIPE NCC)." While it would be nice to have a specific proposal on that, > until we discuss it and get a better grasp of the pros and cons of > different approaches, that is obviously premature. It is in progress - some of the ERX holders are discussing this on a mailing list. In the interim, there's not much point in creating proposals until the ERX holders have come up with some concrete ideas about what they're looking for. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 Maintenance Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 Maintenance Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]