[address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chris
chrish at consol.net
Tue Apr 3 11:42:31 CEST 2012
hi! On 04/02/2012 05:15 PM, Sascha Luck wrote: > assignment != allocation right. also, policy clearly states its purpose to ensure 'consistent and fair' allocation 'to meet the needs', and that allocation is tied to usage/assignments. with respect to the nature of ripe this is intrinsic, so i'd find it a bit surprising if that might not be understood or overlooked - if it's really perceived as a problem, it might be the right thing to elaborate on this some more in the policy text. it's ofc relatively uncommon that the need for ip space of a lir actually significantly decreases over time, the opposite being the natural development. nevertheless this - reclaiming of allocated space not needed anymore - happens and is regularly pursued by the ncc. regards, Chris
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]