[address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)

Hi,

On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:13:03PM +0100, Sascha Luck wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:40:10PM +0200, Turchanyi Geza wrote:
> 
> >Good to hear that the working group affected is supporting the proposal.
> >Perhaps this is the most important.
> 
> What is the current status of organisations wrt the PDP? I remember a 
> shitstorm about that in a different context (2007-01?).
> IIRC the outcome was that organisations don't get a say except through
> their individual members?

Technically, only individials speak up regarding policy developments.

Nevertheless, for policy proposals involving other RIPE working groups
(be it DNS for "addresses for anycasting" or EIX for this one), it's
certainly welcome if the underlying questions are discussed in the respective
working group as well, and members from there come here to state their
opinion based on that discussion - especially given that these other
working groups might have a better understanding of the technical
issues involved.

I think for IXPs, we can do quite well :-) - but for DNS related proposals,
we had a few statements here where it was helpful to be able to draw on
the wisdom of the DNS WG...

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279