[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Fri Sep 23 16:38:04 CEST 2011
Hi Sasha, > Besides, the request form already contains the "why-pi" question. So my suggestion was redundant anyway... > A requirement to "prove that you're worthy" would just lead to applicants concocting whatever story they think the IPRA will believe and be completely useless information. I think you misunderstood me. I wanted a (maybe bit more extensive) why-pi question. The question would be for documentation purposes only. I don't *ever* want the NCC to add a question that actually influences the decision without that being approved through the full PDP! My apologies if I created that impression. >> Considering that this well-intended suggestion to the NCC seems to have caused controversy and distract from the actual policy proposal we will not send the suggestion to the NCC. > > Without the requirement I do, of course, fully support the policy. Thank you expressing you opinion explicitly. That makes our lives as working group chairs so much easier! Sander -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2084 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20110923/2c770e22/attachment.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]