[address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
niels=apwg at bakker.net
niels=apwg at bakker.net
Mon Oct 31 16:34:27 CET 2011
* fweimer at bfk.de (Florian Weimer) [Wed 26 Oct 2011, 15:43 CEST]: >* Emilio Madaio: > >> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-05 > >I oppose this policy. IXPs shouldn't be special-cased. The >assumption of a single peering LAN per organization does not seem to >match the requirements of the industry. It is odd that preexisting >PI space must be returned, but not existing PA space. I assume PA space will just remain allocated but not assigned, i.e. falls under the LIR's assignment window requirements again. -- Niels.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]