[address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Oct 25 21:03:11 CEST 2011
Hi, On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 07:06:05PM +0100, Remco Van Mook wrote: > With some first hand experience in setting up Exchanges, I would suggest > the following: > > - a new IXP gets a /24 > - an existing IXP that runs out of its /24 (whether from this /16 or > another range) gets a /23 and has to return the old /24 > - an existing IXP that runs out of its /23 (whether from this /16 or > another range) gets a /22 and has to return the old /23 I think this is all logical to people setting up exchanges - but indeed, it might be useful to make this clear to people evaluating such a request, quite likely having never worked at an IXP yet... Andy, you're taking notes? :-) Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]