[address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Tue Oct 25 20:43:14 CEST 2011
Hi there, On 25 Oct 2011, at 15:57, Dan Luedtke <maildanrl at googlemail.com> wrote: > I support this proposal. > > One question: > Is it the same /16 in 5.6.2 as in 5.6.3? > Or does that mean that two /16 will be held back? Hi Thanks for your support. An additional /16 is proposed. Andy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]