[address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Tue Oct 25 08:49:39 CEST 2011
On 10/24/11 8:56 PM, Martin Millnert wrote: > My personal opinion on 6RD is: if it is to be treated as a special > case, it should be a special case, meaning it is a temporary > allocation (like all others, but with emphasis), valid only so long it > is used. A 6RD allocation should be 100% 6RD and no other use of it > should be allowed, so that it can easily be returned once the 6RD > deployment is no longer in use. > > That, or, roll native. ;) Hi, Special case means special IPv6 space and special allocations out of that and that means burning RIPE-NCC resources claiming that space back later on - and good luck with that, as we know that allocations rarely can be returned, because somebody deployed something else in that space and is now sorry :) Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]